March 4, 2016

Chesapeake Energy’s Downfall Is Another Oil Company’s Gain

Print More
Former CEO of Chesapeake Energy, Aubrey McClendon was killed in an automobile accident March 2nd, a day after being indicted on corruption charges


Former CEO of Chesapeake Energy, Aubrey McClendon was killed in an automobile accident March 2nd, a day after being indicted on corruption charges

The U.S. oil and gas industry was shocked on Wednesday by the sudden death of one of its most influential executives. Aubrey McClendon was killed after driving his SUV into a concrete embankment, a day after being indicted on bid rigging and price fixing charges. He was the former CEO of Chesapeake Energy, a major producer now floundering under low oil and gas prices.

Chesapeake Energy is not alone. Watching reports from the oilfield these days, it’s one long string of bad news. Companies large and small are laying off workers and selling off assets. But, in looking at companies in trouble in this oil crash, there’s just something different about Oklahoma-based Chesapeake.

“Chesapeake was really symbolic,” said Joe Wertz, Energy and Environment reporter at StateImpact Oklahoma.

The company was a key leader in the U.S. oil and gas boom of the last decade. It was aggressive with new technologies and took big risks leasing a lot of land with oil and gas locked up in tight shale rock formations.

“They talked about themselves as the world’s biggest fracker,” Wertz said.

All of this was under the leadership of co-founder McClendon. Chesapeake grew fast, becoming the country’s second largest producer of natural gas in the mid 2000’s and making McClendon a billionaire.

Steve Trammel, an oil and gas expert with analytics firm IHS, said the shale rush helped lead to where we are today.

“Everybody kind of caught shale fever,” he said.

Chesapeake took out loan after loan, trying to grab up as much land and drill as much as they could. The company helped inspire so much drilling that it led to a huge oversupply in the market. Natural gas prices crashed in 2008 and Chesapeake was in trouble. The company’s debt became increasingly difficult to manage, and in 2013 the board of directors forced McClendon out.

New leadership is trying to get Chesapeake’s finances under control. But, it’s not an easy task, especially as oil prices tanked in the last year and a half. The company is beating back bankruptcy rumors; it lost almost $15 billion in 2015 and its stock is trading at $4, down 75 percent from a year ago.

Bargain Hunting

Trammel points out a flip side to all of this. If Chesapeake is selling assets, that means somebody is buying them.

“The people who have good balance sheets are able to pick up some bargains right now and pick up some assets they might never have had access to when prices were stronger than they are,” he said.

As an example, Denver-based FourPoint Energy recently purchased 3,500 of Chesapeake’s oil and gas wells in western Oklahoma and in the Texas panhandle. It’s a good deal for FourPoint. They’re a small company — with the purchase they produce about a 10th of what Chesapeake does — but these are good wells, and oil and gas prices have been so low for awhile now. These kinds of purchases could be a good sign for oil and gas.

Trammel said if he owned an oil and gas company that had managed to stay out of debt, he would definitely be bargain hunting. Whether that means prices have bottomed out is a prediction that seems wise one day, and shaky the next.

The world is still awash in oil and gas. Some of the biggest oil countries, led by Russia and Saudi Arabia, are working on a deal to freeze production levels. But even if that happens there’s no guarantee the oil and gas glut will ease anytime soon.

In Chesapeake Energy country, Oklahoma reporter Wertz said the local economy and tax base are feeling the effects. Meanwhile companies like Chesapeake are just working to stay alive and trying to make it through to drill another day.

What’s Next:

“This is the first case resulting from an ongoing federal antitrust investigation into price fixing, bid rigging and other anticompetitive conduct in the oil and natural gas industry. “

  • Maren Cooke

    How can you have such a lengthy piece on fracking with no mention of climate change (which could easily account for the continued high production around the world despite low prices, simple profit-taking ahead of a price being imposed on carbon), renewables (which will ultimately come out on top, so energy producers should consider diversifying, like DTE’s solar enterprises), and public health risks due to both accidental and chronic pollution (which means that a reduction in fracking is hardly bad news for countless vulnerable residents of shale play regions)? The “bad news” alluded to presumably has to do with jobs, but as the REMI study has demonstrated, there are far more (and safer) jobs in a renewables economy than in the fossil-based economy we have now (

    • Larry Harrison

      I like your article and I worked for an arrogant major and fortunately it was for only the last 1/2 of my 50 years. I was working on a Shale Oil project in the eastern slope of the rockies and salazar was against Shale Oil and gas because it requires 2 – 5 barrels of water to produce one barrel of oil. What do they do with the contaminated water when they are through fracing, Hydraulic fracing
      Disposal of fracing water, pump it back into the ground utilizing injection wells.
      Major oil companies do not have the interest of the people at heart, it is about Big Money and politics. They have political clout and lobbies to support them. It is why or so they said the Rockefeller Foundation divested itself of all fossil fuel holdings. Drilling oil wells is one thing but when it comes to fracing, that is a whole different issue. Drilling a hole and letting the oil run out is one thing but pumping millions of gallons of water in a well to actually break or fracture the rock is rocking mother nature’s boat.
      They have to make a lot of money to pay the lucrative salaries and dividends so how do they make money the easy way, it is too costly to develop renewables.

  • Jerry

    Despite the rebound that Chesapeake stock has seen it is not looking hopeful on the horizon. Oil and Gas companies will be under even more pressure. I fear Chesapeake are in for a long and painful ride and there will be plenty of restructuring to do if they want to come out the other end…