Skip to content
  • About the Project
  • Meet the Team
  • Partners
Support Us
  • Support Us
  • Inside Energy
  • Inside Energy
  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Audio
  • Video
  • Data
  • Educators
  • IE Questions
  • IE Investigations
    • Energy According To Trump
    • Protesting The Pipeline: Standing Rock And The Dakota Access Pipeline
    • Your Natural Gas Boom Is Leaking
    • Feasting On Fuel
    • Reclamation Blues: The Lingering Legacy Of Fossil Fuels
    • Blackout: Reinventing The Grid
    • Denmark’s Road To Renewables
    • The Future Of Coal
    • The Fallout From Falling Oil Prices
    • The Oilfield Spill Problem
    • Energy And The New Congress
    • Boom 2.0
    • Dark Side Of The Boom
    • The Solar Challenge
    • The Pipeline Network
    • Coal Watch
  • Newsletter
  • Support Us
  • Get To Know Us
    • About the Project
    • Meet the Team
    • Partners

Inside Energy - Bringing energy reporting down to Earth

Inside Energy (https://insideenergy.org/2016/08/29/colorado-oil-gas-initiatives-fail-signature-count-for-november-ballot/)

  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Audio
  • Video
  • Data
  • Educators
  • IE Questions
  • IE Investigations
    • Energy According To Trump
    • Protesting The Pipeline: Standing Rock And The Dakota Access Pipeline
    • Your Natural Gas Boom Is Leaking
    • Feasting On Fuel
    • Reclamation Blues: The Lingering Legacy Of Fossil Fuels
    • Blackout: Reinventing The Grid
    • Denmark’s Road To Renewables
    • The Future Of Coal
    • The Fallout From Falling Oil Prices
    • The Oilfield Spill Problem
    • Energy And The New Congress
    • Boom 2.0
    • Dark Side Of The Boom
    • The Solar Challenge
    • The Pipeline Network
    • Coal Watch
  • Newsletter
Ballot Initiatives

Colorado Oil & Gas Initiatives Fail Signature Count For November Ballot

By Leigh Paterson | August 29, 2016
More
  • More on Ballot Initiatives
  • Subscribe to Ballot Initiatives

Dan Boyce/Inside Energy

A drilling rig operating near Erie, Colorado on Monday.

A drilling rig operating near Erie, Colorado on Monday.

Dan Boyce / Inside Energy

A drilling rig operating near Erie, Colorado on Monday.

 

Colorado’s Secretary of State, Wayne Williams, announced today that initiatives 75 and 78 failed to make the November ballot because supporters didn’t collect enough valid signatures. With this news, a heated, well-funded debate over the future of energy development in the state is tabled, for the moment.

Initiative 75 would have given local governments the authority to regulate development. Initiative 78 would have greatly increased the minimum distance between oil and gas operations and structures like homes, schools, and parks. According to a report from the Colorado Oil & Gas Commission, if the setback measure were to have taken effect, 90 percent of land in Colorado would be off-limits to new development.

The Colorado Oil & Gas Association, an industry trade association, is pleased with the outcome. In a statement, President Dan Haley wrote:

“Coloradans have sent a clear message that they don’t want to resolve these complex issues at the ballot box. The good news is that after this long and unnecessary battle, our state emerges as the winner.”

Environmental groups behind the two initiatives didn’t immediately return calls for comment. They have 30 days to appeal the decision to the Denver District Court.

Some serious money has gotten wrapped up in these issues, though the opposition raised 35 times as much money as the committees behind the measures. According to the most recent data available, the committees behind the ballot initiatives had collected $424,021, mostly in contributions from individuals. The committees opposing the initiatives had collected $15,040,665. For more on how the funding breaks down, check out Jordan Wirfs-Brock’s awesome animation.

Here are some key numbers from the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office relating to today’s announcement:

  • 98,492 signatures are required to get an initiative on the 2016 November ballot in Colorado. Check out the equation behind that number here.

Petition 75

  • Total number of qualified signatures submitted: 107,232
  • From a 5% random sample, 25.7% of signatures were thrown out
  • Petition 75 is projected to have gotten 80.85% of the required valid signatures

Petition 78

  • Total number of qualified signatures submitted: 106,626
  • From a 5% random sample, 27.7% of signatures were thrown out
  • Petition 78 is projected to have gotten 78.29% of the required valid signatures

According to the Secretary of State’s office, around 30 percent of signatures submitted for most initiatives are found to be invalid. Ben Schler, with the Elections Division, walks us through the complicated, tedious process of signature counting here.

Initiatives 75 and 78 won’t be on the November ballot, but that doesn’t mean the issues of local control and setback distance are resolved. In fact, this fight is an extension of recent legal battles around local control. In 2014, those issues also stayed off the Colorado ballot, thanks to a deal Gov. John Hickenlooper brokered between activists and industry.

 

More
  • More on Ballot Initiatives
  • Subscribe to Ballot Initiatives

Related Series

Public Health and Fracking

As communities find themselves in the midst of unprecedented energy development, for people who live near oil and gas wells, are there health risks? Inside Energy met with scientists to learn how oil and gas drilling affects your health and to clarify the confusion: If You Only Read One Story On Public Health And Fracking, Read This One.

Tags
  • Inside Energy News
  • Making Energy
  • Ballot Initiatives
  • Colorado
  • Colorado Politics
  • Economy
  • election
  • Energy
  • local control
  • Oil And Gas
  • Secretary of state
  • setback distance

About Leigh Paterson

Leigh Paterson is a reporter for Inside Energy, based in Wyoming.

  • More by Leigh

Read Next

  • Battle Brews Over Methane Leaks

    While the head of the EPA goes on a tour of 25 states, the agency is rolling back a host of environmental regulations — including trying to delay implementation of Obama-era methane rules at oil and gas wells. Some residents and environmental groups are taking action, concerned that methane leaks lead to poor air quality.

Previous Post
University of Wyoming’s Utility Bill Climbs As Budget Falls
Next Post
IE Questions: Is A Petroleum Engineering Degree A Good Idea?
Inside Energy is a collaborative journalism initiative of partners across the US and supported by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
  • Inside Energy
  • About The Project
  • Meet The Team
  • Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • Terms Of Use

Search This Site

Browse Archives

© Copyright 2025, Inside Energy

Inside Energy is a member of the Institute for Nonprofit News

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑