Skip to content
  • About the Project
  • Meet the Team
  • Partners
Support Us
  • Support Us
  • Inside Energy
  • Inside Energy
  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Audio
  • Video
  • Data
  • Educators
  • IE Questions
  • IE Investigations
    • Energy According To Trump
    • Protesting The Pipeline: Standing Rock And The Dakota Access Pipeline
    • Your Natural Gas Boom Is Leaking
    • Feasting On Fuel
    • Reclamation Blues: The Lingering Legacy Of Fossil Fuels
    • Blackout: Reinventing The Grid
    • Denmark’s Road To Renewables
    • The Future Of Coal
    • The Fallout From Falling Oil Prices
    • The Oilfield Spill Problem
    • Energy And The New Congress
    • Boom 2.0
    • Dark Side Of The Boom
    • The Solar Challenge
    • The Pipeline Network
    • Coal Watch
  • Newsletter
  • Support Us
  • Get To Know Us
    • About the Project
    • Meet the Team
    • Partners

Inside Energy - Bringing energy reporting down to Earth

Inside Energy (https://insideenergy.org/2016/12/04/tribe-supporters-celebrate-historic-decision-denying-pipeline-permit/)

  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Audio
  • Video
  • Data
  • Educators
  • IE Questions
  • IE Investigations
    • Energy According To Trump
    • Protesting The Pipeline: Standing Rock And The Dakota Access Pipeline
    • Your Natural Gas Boom Is Leaking
    • Feasting On Fuel
    • Reclamation Blues: The Lingering Legacy Of Fossil Fuels
    • Blackout: Reinventing The Grid
    • Denmark’s Road To Renewables
    • The Future Of Coal
    • The Fallout From Falling Oil Prices
    • The Oilfield Spill Problem
    • Energy And The New Congress
    • Boom 2.0
    • Dark Side Of The Boom
    • The Solar Challenge
    • The Pipeline Network
    • Coal Watch
  • Newsletter
Army Corps of Engineers

Tribe, Supporters Celebrate ‘Historic Decision’ Denying Pipeline Permit

By Amy Sisk | December 4, 2016
More
  • More on Army Corps of Engineers
  • Subscribe to Army Corps of Engineers

Amy Sisk/Inside Energy

The Army Corps of Engineers announced Sunday it would reject the final permit needed for the Dakota Access Pipeline, pictured here, to cross under the Missouri River in North Dakota.

The federal government handed a victory Sunday to the tribe and its supporters fighting the Dakota Access Pipeline, announcing it would deny the permit needed to complete the project.

The Army Corps of Engineers said it will instead launch a more thorough review of the oil pipeline, considering alternate routes. The 1,200-mile line was slated to cross under the Missouri River in North Dakota next to the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation.

“The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and all of Indian Country will forever be grateful to the Obama Administration for this historic decision,” Standing Rock Chairman Dave Archambault said in a statement.

The tribe sued the Corps this summer trying to stop the pipeline, concerned that a potential spill would contaminate its drinking water downstream. A federal judge denied the tribe’s request for an injunction to halt construction. The tribe appealed, but that request was also rejected by a panel of judges.

Interior Secretary Sally Jewell praised the “thoughtful approach” taken by the Corps.

“The Army’s announcement underscores that tribal rights reserved in treaties and federal law, as well as Nation-to-Nation consultation with tribal leaders, are essential components of the analysis to be undertaken in the environmental impact statement going forward,” she said.

While the thousands of people camped along the snowy banks of the Missouri River in solidarity with the tribe cheered upon learning the news Sunday, the future of the pipeline remains unclear as the Corps begins the process of the more thorough review, known as an environmental impact statement. The Corps promised “full public input and analysis” while it considers routes other than the one slated to cross under the river next to the reservation.

The Corps did not offer a timeline for when the review will be finished or where the other routes might go.

The Midwest Alliance for Infrastructure Now — a coalition of energy, labor and other groups that support the Dakota Access Pipeline — suggested the fight for the pipeline’s continued construction may not be over.

“With President-elect Trump set to take office in just a few weeks, we are hopeful that this is not the final word on the Dakota Access Pipeline,” said Craig Stevens, a spokesperson for the coalition.

The pipeline is already nearly complete, with hundreds of miles of pipe buried underground. The project crosses four states from the Bakken oil fields, through the Dakotas and Iowa to Illinois.

Construction has remained halted for months at its Missouri River crossing near the Standing Rock reservation while the Corps delayed making a decision on whether to grant the easement needed to connect the pipe laid on either side of the river. The Corps concluded last month that it met legal requirements in permitting the pipeline but sought more input from the Standing Rock tribe.

“Although we have had continuing discussion and exchanges of new information with the Standing Rock Sioux and Dakota Access, it’s clear that there’s more work to do,” said Jo-Ellen Darcy, the Army’s assistant secretary for civil works. “The best way to complete that work responsibly and expeditiously is to explore alternate routes for the pipeline crossing.”

North Dakota Gov. Jack Dalrymple called the Corps’s denial of the permit Sunday a “serious mistake.”

“It does nothing to resolve the issue, and worst of all it prolongs the serious problems faced by North Dakota law enforcement as they try to maintain public safety,” he said.

The state of North Dakota has authorized $17 million over the past four months to respond to demonstrators who oppose the pipeline. Thousands of protesters have camped on the prairie near pipeline construction for months, staging demonstrations from work areas to the state Capitol an hour north. Police officers have made more than 500 arrests, as they say protesters trespassed, engaged in riots and vandalized equipment, among other criminal acts.

Protest leaders have decried what they consider militarized tactics on the part of police. Law enforcement has used pepper spray, non-lethal bullets, tear gas and water hoses to contain crowds. Organizers of the protest maintain that demonstrators are unarmed.

“Throughout this effort I have stressed the importance of acting at all times in a peaceful and prayerful manner — and that is how we will respond to this decision,” Archambault said. “With this decision we look forward to being able to return home and spend the winter with our families and loved ones, many of whom have sacrificed as well.”

But to the pipeline’s supporters, the Corps’s announcement ushered in disappointment.

“Today’s unfortunate decision sends a very chilling signal to others who want to build infrastructure in this country,” said Rep. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D. “Roads, bridges, transmission lines, pipelines, wind farms and water lines will be very difficult, if not impossible, to build when criminal behavior is rewarded this way.”

Cramer criticized President Barack Obama for making the pipeline decision on his way out of the office. Obama said in an interview with Now This News last month that he wanted to look at options to re-route the project, though it wasn’t until Sunday that the Corps announced that was its plan.

“I’m encouraged we will restore law and order next month when we get a President who will not thumb his nose at the rule of law,” Cramer said.

More
  • More on Army Corps of Engineers
  • Subscribe to Army Corps of Engineers

Related Series

Protesting The Pipeline: Standing Rock And The Dakota Access Pipeline

Native American tribes from across the country have gathered in North Dakota to protest the Dakota Access pipeline, a 1,200-mile pipeline that would carry oil from the Bakken to Illinois.

Tags
  • Inside Energy News
  • Army Corps of Engineers
  • Dakota Access pipeline
  • DAPL
  • dave archambault
  • easement
  • kevin cramer
  • main coalition
  • NoDAPL
  • oil pipeline
  • Sally Jewell
  • standing rock
  • standing rock sioux tribe

About Amy Sisk

Amy Sisk is a reporter for Inside Energy based in North Dakota.

  • More by Amy

Read Next

  • Your Most Pressing Dakota Access Pipeline Questions, Answered

    What’s going on with that pipeline in North Dakota? Momentum behind the Dakota Access pipeline protests has been building for months. The 1,200 mile-long pipeline project is controversial, involving many big-picture interests, issues, and plenty of misinformation. You’ve been flooding us with great questions, and we’re answering them.

Previous Post
Dakota Access Protest Camp Faces Winter And Evacuation Orders
Next Post
Oil And Gas See Prospects Bright Under Trump
Inside Energy is a collaborative journalism initiative of partners across the US and supported by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
  • Inside Energy
  • About The Project
  • Meet The Team
  • Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • Terms Of Use

Search This Site

Browse Archives

© Copyright 2025, Inside Energy

Inside Energy is a member of the Institute for Nonprofit News

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑